In National Contracting Company Limited vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), the Madras High Court addressed a writ petition ...
The adjudicating officer emphasized that the penalty was proportionate to the non-compliance, with the maximum allowable ...
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH, CORPORATE ...
9. The Noticee shall pay the amount of penalty by way of e-payment [available on Ministry website mca.gov.in] under “Pay ...
The Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh, issued an adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, ...
11. Attention is also invited to section 454 (8) of the Companies Act, 2013, in the event of non­compliance of this order. In ...
The adjudicating officer determined that each director, along with the company, was liable for a penalty of ₹1,00,000, ...
3. During the course of Inquiry, the following non-compliances were observed from the Minutes Books of the proceedings of the ...
8. The Noticee shall pay the amount of penalty by way of e-payment [available on Ministry website mca.gov.in] under “Pay ...
Thus, it is evident that the company and its Directors have failed to comply with the provisions of section 161 (1) of the ...
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, Uttar Pradesh 37/17, Westcott Building, ...
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH, CORPORATE ...