Technology has come a long way since the Court first struck down age-verification requirements. Age verification services are now effective, easily used, and secure enough to be widely deployed. However the Court rules in this particular case, the era of the online pornography free-for-all seems to be coming to a close.

The Supreme Court’s decision today is a setback for First Amendment rights and the U.S.' role as a defender of the open internet.

The media brand worked with long-time agency partner Jennifer Bett Communications to recreate the site at ‘lightning speed.’

In late November of last year, the B.C. Conservative caucus voted to appoint Jody Toor, newly elected MLA for Langley-Willowbrook, as caucus chair.

When offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion become toxic, what is a major university to do? Do away with them? Pfft. That's admitting defeat. No, just rebrand it to something that sounds perfectly innocuous.

President Donald Trump is taking on TikTok, electric vehicle policy, and AI in his first 100 days in office. This time around, he has the backing of many tech billionaires.

For the second year, half of Supreme Court cases involve the federal government as respondents or petitioners, a novel trend for the justices.

Term limits, court expansion, and ethics were addressed as possible SCOTUS reforms during the inaugural event with Open to Debate

When the Supreme Court upheld a law that banned TikTok from the US, it seemed well aware that its ruling could resonate far beyond one app. The justices delivered an unsigned opinion with a quote from Justice Felix Frankfurter from 1944: “in considering the application of established legal rules to the ‘totally new problems’ raised by the airplane and radio,

The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether states may reject religious charter schools from receiving public funding, agreeing to hear arguments in an appeal out of Oklahoma involving the ...

The U.S. Supreme Court will take on its first free speech case this month. Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton involves the constitutionality of a Texas law

Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act, which requires millions of companies to disclose their true ownership, remains on hold despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Treasury Department.